Skip to content

Can AI take meeting minutes? How it actually works

By · Notibo

Published · 11 min read · updated

Can AI take meeting minutes? How it actually works

Key takeaways

  • AI minutes are three steps stacked: speech to text, text to summary, summary to structure. An error in the transcript can affect the draft; summarisation can also introduce new errors.
  • Microsoft's 2023 Work Trend Index found that 55 per cent of people leave a meeting unsure of the next steps, and 56 per cent find it hard to summarise what happened.
  • Teams needs a Copilot licence. Zoom's product page gives the free plan three hosted meetings a month, but its support page names paid plans. Google Meet needs an eligible plan and one of eight languages.
  • Check the recording rules and approved processing arrangements before the meeting. Danish guidance describes context-dependent exceptions, not a general right to record.
  • Read the draft the same day and check every decision, every owner and every date against what was agreed in the room.
  • AI minutes are a draft. A formal body still approves its minutes, normally at the following meeting.

Short answer first: yes, AI can take meeting minutes, and what you get is a draft. The tool records the meeting, turns the speech into text, and condenses the text into a summary with the tasks that were handed out. Teams, Zoom and Google Meet can do it inside the call, each with a licence or a plan of its own, and other tools record from a microphone in the room. You still read the draft the same day and correct names, dates and decisions. Before any of it, the people in the meeting have to know that it is being recorded.

A 2017 Harvard Business Review article put executives at nearly 23 hours a week in meetings, against less than 10 in the 1960s. Microsoft's Work Trend Index from 2023 surveyed 31,000 full-time employed or self-employed workers in 31 markets, and 55 per cent said the next steps at the end of a meeting are unclear. Minutes exist to fix that, and they are easy to put off until nobody remembers what was agreed.

What happens when AI takes minutes?

It happens in layers, one on top of the other, and it helps to keep them apart, because each one fails in its own way.

Step 1: speech becomes text

The tool attempts to turn recorded speech into text; the output may omit, alter or misattribute words. This is the foundation. A misheard name can carry through into the summary, so the language and the sound quality matter more at this step than at any other.

Step 2: the text is condensed

A language model reads the transcript and picks out what mattered: what was discussed, what was agreed, what was left open. It may omit a condition or turn an uncertain suggestion into a definite decision. Check that the summary is supported by the meeting rather than assuming fluent wording is accurate.

Step 3: the summary gets a structure

Last, the summary is sorted under headings, with the tasks apart from the discussion. That is the difference between a transcript and notes: one is everything, the other is what you can send round and act on.

How does it work from meeting to sent minutes?

The routine is short. You tell the participants, start the recording, and take part in the meeting instead of writing. When it ends, the tool processes the sound and returns a draft. You read it, correct it and send it. The whole gain lies in the first draft being there when you sit down.

Consider an illustrative project meeting of 45 minutes with five people. The transcript runs to many pages. The draft that comes back fits on one: a few headings, the tasks with names, the questions left open. The project lead reads it and changes two things. One date is wrong, because two dates were mentioned in the same breath. One task has no name, because the person said "I'll take that". Then it goes out, the same afternoon.

That last part is the one that matters. A delay makes checking details harder, especially if the supporting material is incomplete. If the structure of the minutes is what you struggle with, a template for meeting notes gives you the four headings to aim for.

Does your meeting platform already write the minutes?

It may. If your meetings are video calls, the platform probably has an assistant, and each of the three large ones attaches a condition.

Platform What it needs What to know
Microsoft Teams, Copilot An add-on Microsoft Copilot licence To ask about the meeting afterwards, a transcript must exist
Zoom, Meeting summary Product page: three hosted meetings a month on the free Basic plan. Support page: a licensed user on a paid plan Only the host and co-host can start or stop it, and only the host can edit the summary
Google Meet, Take notes for me An eligible Google Workspace edition or Google AI plan Eight languages, one at a meeting; recommended for meetings of 15 minutes to 8 hours; also for meetings in person

Microsoft's guide for administrators describes two ways of running Copilot in a meeting. "During and after the meeting" works from a transcript that someone has started. "Only during the meeting" works from speech-to-text data that is not saved when the meeting ends. If the organiser turns Copilot off, recording and transcription are turned off with it.

Zoom's two pages do not say the same thing. Its product page includes summaries of three hosted meetings a month in the free Workplace Basic plan, while its support page lists a licensed user on a paid Workplace plan as the requirement. The support page also says the summary may use third-party models, and that participants receive it only if the host chooses to share it. Google's help page says Meet informs every participant that notes are being taken, and saves the notes document in the organiser's Drive. Dedicated apps are compared in the best meeting notes apps.

What is AI good at, and where does it go wrong?

AI can help prepare a first draft from a permitted recording. It does not guarantee complete capture: microphone placement, overlapping speech, interruptions and processing errors can all leave gaps.

It goes wrong in predictable places. Names, product names and abbreviations are misheard. Two people talking at once become one muddled sentence. A language the tool handles less well than English gives more of all of it. And the model cannot know what your team meant, only what it said.

  • It records what was said, not what was meant. "We should look at that" comes out as a task or as nothing, and the model cannot tell which.
  • It does not know your people. A task given to "you" needs a name, and only someone who was there can add it.
  • It has no sense of what is confidential. A remark about a colleague is summarised like anything else.

Meetings in two languages are a case of their own. Google's notes handle one language at a meeting, and Zoom writes its summary in the language most of the participants spoke. If your team moves between English and another language in the same meeting, test exactly that before you trust a tool with it.

What should you check in the draft?

Read it as you would read minutes written by a new colleague: with goodwill, and with a pen. The same mistakes come up often enough to make a checklist.

Check How it goes wrong What you do
Decisions A suggestion is written down as decided Compare each one with what was agreed aloud
Owners "I'll take that", with no name Put a name on every task
Dates Two dates were mentioned and the first one was kept Correct it to the date that was agreed
Names and terms People, products and abbreviations are misheard Search the draft for the ones you know were used
Open questions Missing, because nobody summed them up Add them yourself

Budget review time according to the meeting's complexity. If a draft needs substantial correction, inspect both the transcript and the summarisation: better sound cannot fix every wrong inference or omission.

Do you have to tell people that you are recording?

Tell participants before recording, and confirm that both the recording and the chosen processing service are permitted. For organisational meetings covered by GDPR, the organisation needs an appropriate legal basis and must address information, access, security and retention. A notice in the invitation does not settle all of those questions.

Denmark's data protection authority describes recording digital meetings as a contextual assessment. Its guidance includes limited situations involving necessary documentation or particular relationships between participants. Do not treat those examples as permission for any workplace meeting, or as a rule for another country.

The European Commission's guidance on legal grounds also explains why consent may not be freely given where there is a power imbalance. Use your organisation's approved procedure, especially for personnel matters or client information. If recording is not appropriate, use the written template instead.

Where does the recording end up?

Ask any tool where the files are stored and where the sound is processed. The answers are often two different countries. A service can keep your notes in the EU and send the audio to a speech-to-text provider in the United States under the European Commission's Standard Contractual Clauses. The clauses can provide transfer safeguards but do not by themselves establish that recording, processing or a particular transfer is lawful, and for a meeting about redundancies or a client's contract you want to know about it beforehand.

Ask also what happens to the audio afterwards. Decide how long the audio is needed under your organisation's purpose and retention requirements. A tool that deletes it, or a deletion date you set yourself, leaves less behind to leak, to be asked for, or to be forgotten in an old account.

Are AI minutes valid as formal minutes?

They are a draft, and nothing about the approval changes. Formal minutes belong to the body that held the meeting. A university's governance handbook describes the usual order: the chair signs off the draft, and the committee approves it at its following meeting. Other formal bodies have rules of their own, and the principle is the same: the body approves its minutes, not the tool.

What changes is the starting point. The secretary begins with an automated draft and whatever source record the tool retains, and spends the time on checking instead of on reconstructing. Agree which version is the official record and how recordings and drafts will be retained or deleted. Check the tool's actual retention behaviour before relying on audio for approval.

How do you prepare a meeting so the draft is usable?

Most of what makes a draft good happens before the tool is involved. A meeting where decisions are said clearly gives clear minutes, with or without AI.

Before the meeting

  • Write in the invitation that the meeting will be recorded for the minutes, and who to tell if that is a problem.
  • Send an agenda. The model has an easier job when the conversation follows a known order.
  • Test the microphone in the room you will use. Test whether every participant can be heard clearly from the position you choose.

During the meeting

  • Say it again at the start, and wait for an answer before you press record.
  • Use names when tasks are handed out: "Sarah sends the offer by Friday", not "you take that".
  • Close each item by saying the decision aloud. It helps the people in the room as much as the tool.
  • Stop the recording when the meeting turns to something that should not be on record.

After the meeting

  • Read the draft the same day, with the checklist above beside you.
  • Share the appropriate version with authorised recipients, after any required approval.
  • Apply the agreed retention policy and check whether the tool has already deleted the audio.

Where Notibo fits

Notibo records microphone audio in a browser on a computer or phone. On a phone, keep the page open and the screen unlocked. For a video meeting it can take the sound of a browser tab in Chrome or Edge, and on Windows the sound of the whole system. No bot joins the call, and there is no meeting link to paste. You can also upload a recording you already have, and the transcription page shows how.

You get a transcript and structured notes with a summary, the main points and action items, in the language that was spoken. Notibo transcribes 78 languages. The transcript and the notes can be corrected in the app, exported as PDF or Word, and shared with a link that gives read access.

Know the limits before you rely on it for minutes. The transcript is split by speaker only where Notibo can tell the voices apart, so in a meeting with many voices you add the names yourself. The checklist above applies to Notibo's draft as it does to any other.

The audio is deleted when the transcript and notes are saved. Files are stored in the EU, in Frankfurt, and transcription and the AI notes run on processors in the United States under Standard Contractual Clauses. The privacy policy names each of them.

Pro is free for 14 days with 240 minutes of recording, and no card is needed. The trial begins with your first recording or when you start it explicitly, and ends by itself, and the account then keeps 30 minutes a month on the free plan. Pro is 9.99 euro a month or 88.99 euro a year, with 1,200 minutes a month, and the pricing page has the details.

Frequently asked questions

Do I have to tell the other participants that a meeting is being recorded?
Tell participants before recording and follow the rules that apply to the meeting and your organisation. Where GDPR applies, identify an appropriate legal basis, purpose, retention period and processing arrangements. Informing people is not by itself permission to record or upload their information.
How accurate are AI meeting minutes?
No honest figure covers every meeting. Both transcription and summarisation can introduce errors. Errors gather in names, technical terms, dates and anything said by two people at once, and a decision that was vague in the room comes out vague in the draft. Test the tool on ten minutes of your own meeting and count those errors.
Can AI take minutes from a meeting in a room, not only a video call?
Yes, if the tool records from a microphone. Google says Take notes for me can also be used for a meeting in person, with a device set nearby, on the same plans and in the same eight languages. Whatever you use, put the device in the middle of the table, ask people to speak one at a time, and have names said aloud when tasks are handed out.
How long does it take before the minutes are ready?
The draft comes quickly. Google says its notes document is generated shortly after the meeting ends and saved in the organiser's Drive. Allow time to check and approve the draft. Aim to do that promptly, following your organisation's procedure.
Are AI minutes valid as formal minutes for a board or committee?
They are a draft. Follow the body's own approval rules. For example, Manchester describes chair sign-off followed normally by committee approval at the next meeting, with correspondence also possible. AI changes where the secretary starts, not who approves.
Do the assistants in Teams, Zoom and Google Meet work in every language?
No. Google lists eight languages for Take notes for me: English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese and Spanish, one language at a meeting. Zoom says its summary works in several languages, and that when more than one is spoken it comes in the language most participants used. Check the vendor's list for your own language before you rely on any of them.

Sources

  1. Stop the Meeting Madness (Perlow, Hadley and Eun, Harvard Business Review, 2017) (executives average nearly 23 hours a week in meetings, up from less than 10 in the 1960s)
  2. Work Trend Index: Will AI Fix Work? (Microsoft, 2023) (31,000 people in 31 markets; 55 per cent say next steps are unclear, 56 per cent find it hard to summarise what happened)
  3. Manage Microsoft Copilot in Teams meetings and events (Microsoft Learn) (Copilot needs an add-on licence; it works during and after the meeting from a transcript, or only during the meeting on speech-to-text data that is not saved)
  4. Using Meeting Summary with AI (Zoom Support) (the support page lists a licensed user on a paid Zoom Workplace plan; only the host and co-host start or stop it; only the host can edit the summary)
  5. Take notes for me in Google Meet (Google Meet Help) (eligible Workspace edition or Google AI plan; eight languages; recommended for meetings of 15 minutes to 8 hours; also for meetings in person; participants are informed; notes saved in the organiser's Drive)
  6. Optagelser og tv-overvågning (Datatilsynet) (recording a digital meeting needs a legal basis; documentation without consent only when necessary; otherwise consent; silence is not consent; think about the storage period)
  7. Legal grounds for processing data (European Commission) (consent must be freely given and made by an affirmative act; it is not freely given where there is a clear imbalance, such as employer and employee)
  8. Standard Contractual Clauses (European Commission) (the clauses used as a ground for transfers of personal data from the EU to third countries)

About the author

BaaliTech

BaaliTech builds Notibo in Odense, Denmark. The articles cover study methods, memory and note-taking, based on the questions students send in and on what the product's own data shows.

Try it on your next meeting

Notibo records the meeting in your browser and returns a transcript with a summary, main points and action items. Pro is free for 14 days, no card.

Create free account

Back to the blog